Monday, December 2, 2013

Last Arvizu: corrupt judges have to be in jail in a local teen killed after a quarrel international

Unmanned aircraft | Metropolis Newspaper
Last Arvizu: corrupt judges have to be in jail in a local teen killed after a quarrel international media, will Syria weapons destroyed in Albania Macedonian Albanians refer to the visit of Rama trenches prohibits police truck with chrome 17
United States say they have no plans to stop attacks by drones in Pakistani territory, arguing that attacks against astronaut terrorist leaders taken to protect American sovereignty. U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, met yesterday in defense of the attacks, during a visit to New Delhi. He said Washington has made it clear that it will defend herself and that shocks are also in the interest of the people astronaut of Pakistan, who is the victim of attacks by insurgents.
Mr. Panetta made the comments a day after the White House confirmed the killing of the number two Abu Yahya al-Qaida al-Libya, it is understood by one stroke with drone aircraft in the North Waziristan region of Pakistan. The White House said that U.S. intelligence services have confirmed the death of al-Libi. astronaut
The Obama administration has added its missions with fighter jets unmanned drone in Pakistan astronaut and Yemen. Analysts are concerned astronaut about the political problems that can cause unintentional killing of civilians.
The United States has increased the intensity missions with unmanned aircraft (drone) in South Yemen and along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border last month, confirming 14 attacks of which were killed 70 suspected militants. Airstrikes are a plus for the campaign of President Barack Obama in the fight against Al Qaeda, but these attacks are costing America economically and politically. Although U.S. troops withdrew from Iraq in December 2011 and will do so even from Afghanistan in 2014, unmanned aircraft are on the offensive since January 2009 when Obama won the presidency.
John Brennan, the war against terrorism adviser to President Obama, in a speech on April 30 at the Woodrow Wilson astronaut Center, called the attacks "ethical", "legal" and "right". Brennan argued astronaut the right to be protected under international law and the authority of Congress, by Al Qaeda and the Taliban. "This is a tool that minimizes the loss of life of civilians," he said.
But on May 29, "New York Times" reported that the numbers presented may not officially astronaut be those truths. President Obama has received a counting of victims that can be distorted. According to a source, "NYT" security services, all men that are in place are militants attacked presumably, if the facts do not prove otherwise. He called this "guilt by association", ie such that the guilty are people around you. "This is a program that attacks the alleged basis, so if you are a man from Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen or any Arab country astronaut and is shot by a drone, then you are necessarily astronaut guilty of something," said Tom Parker DW, terrorism expert at Amnesty International. "He means alone can not distinguish between innocent civilians and those individuals that management believes are militants. I want to stress the word 'believe', then I do not know for sure, "said Parker.
Unable to convince Pakistan to launch an offensive against Islamist militants on the ground, Washington has intensified the campaign in North and South Waziristan region, arguing that the attacks carried out to prevent possible astronaut attacks on coalition forces serving astronaut in neighboring Afghanistan. Foundation based in Washington The "New America", reports that since 2004 until now killed at least 1,819 people from attacks by unmanned aircraft, which are thought to be 293 innocent civilians. According to the magazine, "Long War Journal" about 2,300 militants and 138 civilians were killed by attacks of this kind since 2006 in Paksitan.
Pakistani Parliament urged the U.S. last March to end drone aircraft missions, arguing that such a thing Paksitanit violates sovereignty and endangering the lives of innocent civilians, resulting in the addition of hatred against America. But Washington is justified by its right to be protected, especially after the September 11 attacks. "The administration is playing with fire," said John Bellinger, legal adviser to the National Security Council and State Department during the Bush. "We see a growing tension in the community of human rights and international opinion could turn against the administration from using drone," says Bellinger.
Washington calls its legal fight against Al Qaeda, the front of which is open to various countries of the world. "Europeans and activists of human rights in all bo

No comments:

Post a Comment