J-20 and J-31 test sparked great interest expendable abroad. expendable Judging expendable from the

The United States diplomatic cables leak: that an overseas special ...
Chang E successful launch expendable of the 3rd: Anglo-German law actually a tight East: Chinese Air Force has rushed to mobilize 8
J-20 and J-31 test sparked great interest expendable abroad. expendable Judging expendable from the appearance, which is the fifth-generation fighter: J-20 like the F-22, like the F -31 F-35. But we all know, the fourth generation of the standard Chinese-made engine even yet reached, the J-20 and J-31 prospects expendable are uncertain. In addition, the U.S. experience expendable shows that the development of fifth-generation fighter in the cost point has reached a dead end, so China may seek access to thousands of fourth-generation fighter aircraft will be enough expendable (for another 8-10 years will be able to achieve this target). By then, China will be the number of fighters in the world, from the United States and Russia over quantity, the quality is almost favorably. Attack aircraft and bombers: quantity, the new state
Our view of the Russians too many mistakes. expendable For example, many people are still by far the blind confidence that China produced a small number of weapons and equipment, poor quality. In fact, the Chinese expendable military aviation industry has long been in production capacity to become a global leader. Chinese year of manufacture than the number expendable of NATO warplanes sum of 28 member countries (including the United States) are many. China while producing the F-11B, F -16, F -10, JH -7 and H-6M / K, and F-7 for export and JF-17. In the future, the list will also include the production of the J-15, J-20 or the F-31. In addition, China also produces K-8 and L-15 trainer aircraft, as well as good sales in the global market -8 transport aircraft, also developed to compete with the Il-76 heavy transport expendable aircraft transported -20.
Share: Share to Sina Qing
The above statements represent their personal views do not represent the views or position of Sina.