Hello Mary !!! I discovered your page through AWARDS blogs, I found it very interesting and very or

The Ministry of Education has just to show your draft education law. What we have before dsei a law is completely outdated, antipedagóxica, class, segregated and many more adjectives. The law as a whole is already being analyzed and criticized by many people, and I suppose that criticism will not stop growing. I share many of them, but for this blog I share that concern to the technological education.
In the XXI century dramatically reduces the technological training in the compulsory education and eliminated 4th ESO and Baccalaureate currently LOMCE 1ºESO - - 1ºESO Core Technologies Core Technologies dsei 2ºESO mandatory dsei mandatory 2ºESO - - Core Technologies 3ºESO mandatory 3ºESO Choose from "Design and Technology" and "Using ICT" 4 º ESO optional Core Technology 4 º ESO ICT applied Computer Sciences Core option can choose any path, oriented bachelor or FP does not appear in the technology oriented bachelor ways. I 1ºBach Technology Industrial Area of sport in the way science and engineering 1ºBach - - IT Elective IT Elective I 2ºBach Technology Industrial Area of sport in the way science and engineering 2ºBach - - Electrical Chair mode via the science and engineering - -
To do this can only be understood from the perspective of those who have a deep technological ignorance, that does not value the knowledge and culture of all the artificial environment around us, who despises the technical professions and who have little insight into the training needs of a society century.
To begin, the first course of ESO addresses the technological knowledge through a set of unconnected subjects of different name, when what should be done is to introduce technology from a global point of view, in which all subjects are interrelated. This is where students acquire a minimum technological culture to enable him to understand the artificial world, its features, processes and their impact in the advancement of society. It draws attention to "use" of ICT as a name for a chair, as if ICTs were used in, or with the intention of not addressing the mechanisms that make possible its existence and that allow us to understand its operation. All this seems like a total nonsense.
Remove the technology via 4th ESO-oriented Bachelor and Industrial Technology eliminate it as a modality for the students interested dsei in engineering dsei studies or higher cycles of FP branches of technology seems an aberration. This way you will not be able to offer guidance and preparation towards these studies, and will cause a reduction of the knowledge and skills necessary to address them to achieve success.
There is currently a "Method of Science and Technology", and LOMCE changed to "Method of Science". dsei They do not realize that removing technology scientific training also lost, reduced and limited to two chairs. Nowadays science and technology dsei go together, complement, and can not be understood without the other no.
In a crisis situation like the one we need to live more than ever people made, and if we want this country to be a competitive and technologically advanced despise education technology is the last thing you should do, it is a real suicide.
Hello Mary !!! I discovered your page through AWARDS blogs, I found it very interesting and very original..He seen your rating ... so has my vote and I hope they go up in the rankings and wish you success !!!
Answer
Do not! just stand there! The first thing to do is join the association of teachers of technology each region. In the network there tecnoprofes movement and some ideas and initiatives. You can to put you in contact with us there. In apetega have extraordinary assembly on Thursday at 19: 00h at IES Rosalia de Castro, in Compostela.
Professor of mathematics (and supposed "benefit" in terms of this schedule change) wanted to stop the comment that you have my support in your complaints. Indeed it is anachronistic to think about reducing / eliminating a fundamental issue in the twenty-first century education. The fact that remove the chair of Technology designed the itinerary to the bachelor comes convey that they have no idea what that stuff, besides reaffirming their ignorance and prejudice against the FP. My personal impression is that they did not know what to do with the time distribution after announcing that it would give more importance to the "core subjects", and eventually loaded the stuff that did not appear in the law Palasí Villar. So simple, and so sad. Many courage.
These people can not say that science eliminating power technology is the 4th